| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 12 post(s) |
Roemy Schneider
BINFORD
   |
Posted - 2009.04.02 10:11:00 -
[1]
agility has an influence on many things. but you're targeting only one of these: warp.
since you obviously didnt read the ole' player thread about this topic, let me say it again: increase warp threshold from 75 or 80% (i honestly dont know what speeds are required today) by no more than 5%
-> acceleration and maneuverabilty still feels better, current orbits can be maintained and for once you will have managed to surgically tackle the actual problem. (and it can't be any harder to modify than the agility factors of every ship size)
agility changes will lead to necessary changes to tracking, explosion velocity and targeting range on some frigs, just to name a few
okok im slightly exaggerating. but stick to the issue for once
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Roemy Schneider
BINFORD
|
Posted - 2009.04.02 15:07:00 -
[2]
 Originally by: CCP Nozh
Unfortunately it's not that simple. The acceleration formula is based on mass and the agility modifier. Changing the warp speed threshold changes the balance between the classes drastically.
quoting misinformation: only 1/3 sentences is correct
http://wiki.eveonline.com/wiki/Acceleration
time is linear to mass, time is linear to agility
the balance between classes? shifts linear with it
if you want to bring in the arctanhyp of the locking time equation, i'm prepared for it
now raise the threshold
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Roemy Schneider
BINFORD
|
Posted - 2009.04.03 22:18:00 -
[3]
HACs +20% scan res..?
then +20% scan res on logis! i'm primarily targeting other logis, baby dics and frigs here!!!
and no bonus/help/plus for force recons... have these guys pay for their cov cloak. for everythign else, there's combat recons.
and btw; gj on screwing AFs out of their new found role since the weight-loss. although AB tanking still isnt an option in 0.0 even for them, the guys in low-sec will stop using these "new" bricks, too.
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Roemy Schneider
BINFORD
|
Posted - 2009.04.11 20:03:00 -
[4]
we do have remote sensor boosters - all i'd support would be a bonus to them on some second tier of logistics or if bonuses on existing underappreciated logis would be added
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Roemy Schneider
BINFORD
|
Posted - 2009.04.14 05:24:00 -
[5]
wait what smartbombs dont uncloak...? but thats what ive been told all my life.... tbh i've never really used cloak myself. all i remember is we doomsday'ed a cloaked mom about a year ago and that didnt help.
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Roemy Schneider
BINFORD
|
Posted - 2009.04.19 00:32:00 -
[6]
RIP assault frigs
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
Roemy Schneider
BINFORD
|
Posted - 2009.04.21 12:56:00 -
[7]
so... with assault frigates now AB'ing at 75% max speed and >2km instead of the ordered 1km... how about reducing the mass addition of afterburners? yes, it'll make them a bit faster but you can still stack webs contrary to speed boosters. this wouldnt effect the time-to-warp - but it would counter this AF nerf and make ABs slightly more interesting in general (even though they will still be overrun by (much) bigger MWD ships.)
-
putting the gist back into logistics |
| |
|